Test results

#3
by nenor - opened

Hello,

so i have downloaded all the apex variants and used them via pydantic-deep asking the models to code in C++ without telling them which version, two files .cpp/.h

llama-server -m {model.gguf} --host localhost --port 8080 -t 8 -ngl 999 -b 512 -ub 256 -fa on -ncmoe 32 --jinja --temp 0.6 --top_k 20 --top_p 0.9 --min-p 0.0 --presence-penalty 0 --repeat-penalty 1.0 --parallel 1 --cont-batching --metrics --warmup --chat-template-file chat.jinja*

Config: RX 6700 XT 12GB Vram (Vulkan only) / R7 5700X / 32 GB / Archlinux
*--chat-template-file chat.jinja > They don't have the chat template injected

Score:
Rank | Model | C++ version | Score
πŸ₯‡ 1 | APEX-I-Quality | C++17 | 8.0
πŸ₯ˆ 2 | APEX-I-Compact | C++17 | 7.5
πŸ₯‰ 3 | APEX-Balanced | C++17 | 7.5
4 | APEX-I-Mini | C++11 | 6.5
5 | APEX-I-Balanced | C++14 | 6.5
6 | APEX-Quality | C++14 | 6.5
7 | APEX-Compact | C++11 | 5.5

I have noticed Quality and i Quality and balanced (i guess) > tend to review their codes and edit before they say it's done.

Sign up or log in to comment