Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct (Q4_K_M) for AMD Loom
A Loom package (.loom programs and a model.json card) for the unmodified GGUF checkpoint bartowski/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-GGUF (Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf), generated on an AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" with the loom-skills workflow.
Quick start
pip install "hrx-loom[hf]"
loom-fetch https://huggingface.co/loom-fun/bartowski-Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-loom/resolve/main/model.json --materialize=copy --output=Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct
loom-serve --model=Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct/model.json --device=amdgpu --memory_bytes=5000000000
The server listens on 127.0.0.1:8080 and answers OpenAI-style /v1/chat/completions requests.
Performance vs llama.cpp
| metric | llama.cpp | Loom | margin | roofline | Loom % of roofline | DevLab llama.cpp | DevLab Loom | DevLab llama.cpp Vulkan | local ÷ DevLab (llama.cpp, Loom) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| decode tok/s, short prompt | 285.6 | 327.1 | +15 % | 675.8 | 48 % | 263.0 | 319.5 ¹ | 383.9 | 1.09, 1.02 |
| decode tok/s, 2k context | 254.2 | 430.8 | +69 % | 1176.4 | 37 % | 283.5 | 453.0 ¹ | 299.1 | 0.90, 0.95 |
| decode tok/s, 32k context | 228.0 | 287.2 | +26 % | 728.0 | 39 % | 153.4 | 258.2 ¹ | 201.4 | 1.49, 1.11 |
| prefill tok/s, 1k document | 10835.2 | 17118.7 | +58 % | 77768.6 | 22 % | 11540.3 | 17183.0 ¹ | 12872.1 | 0.94, 1.00 |
| prefill tok/s, 2k document | 9541.7 | 17627.0 | +85 % | 73596.4 | 24 % | 10467.0 | 18116.4 ¹ | 12778.9 | 0.91, 0.97 |
| prefill tok/s, 8k document | 8109.9 | 15667.4 | +93 % | 55675.2 | 28 % | 5749.8 | 15420.6 ¹ | 9014.2 | 1.41, 1.02 |
| prefill tok/s, 16k document | 5519.2 | 11906.1 | +116 % | 42029.3 | 28 % | 4091.9 | 12009.3 ¹ | 6208.4 | 1.35, 0.99 |
| prefill tok/s, 32k document | 3852.2 | 7929.1 | +106 % | 28203.9 | 28 % | 3162.2 | 7989.4 ¹ | 3718.2 | 1.22, 0.99 |
| 4 streams, aggregate decode tok/s | 746.1 | 678.1 | -9 % | 2751.8 | 25 % | 822.1 | 606.2 ¹ | 964.5 | 0.91, 1.12 |
| speculative decoding, drafted tokens accepted | — | 12 % ² | — | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
- llama.cpp: build
llamacpp-rocm/b1369, server arguments-ngl 99 -cram 0 --spec-type ngram-simple -c 33792 -kvu -np 4. - Loom: speculative decoding on (n-gram prompt lookup, depth 2).
- Same GGUF on both engines, tokens per second. Loom: client-side timing; llama.cpp: server-side timings. Runs per value: decode and prefill 2 (mean), 4 streams 3 (median).
- Measured 2026-11-08; device AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S, AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics, Ubuntu 26.04; hrx-loom
0.1.0(hrx-systemd01d1c1); source: local run. - ¹ Measured 2026-11-08; device not recorded; hrx-loom unknown; source: DevLab Dispatch run 42527799430.
- ² Measured 2026-11-08; device AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S, AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics, Ubuntu 24.04; hrx-loom
0.1.0(hrx-systemd01d1c1); source: DevLab Dispatch run 42527979776. - DevLab: the same measurement on an AMD DevLab Dispatch Strix Halo runner; local ÷ DevLab is the local value over the DevLab value of each engine, recorded for comparison, not a verdict.
- DevLab llama.cpp Vulkan: build
llamacpp-vulkan/b12211(archive sha2569759acd), server arguments-ngl 99 -cram 0 --spec-type ngram-simple -c 147456 -np 4; same GGUF, prompts and settings as llama.cpp; measured 2026-11-09 in its own DevLab job (a different runner than the other DevLab columns: compare the engines through ratios, not across jobs); source: DevLab Dispatch run 42569157613. Differs from llama.cpp: KV cache: 4 per-slot caches (-np 4, -c 147456, no -kvu) instead of the ROCm baseline's unified pool: b12211's Vulkan backend has no GPU kernel for the fused flash attention over K/V rows that the unified pool uses. - Drafted tokens accepted: the share of the drafter's proposed tokens the model accepted during the
specgate's requests. - Roofline: the hardware ceiling for this GGUF on AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" (gfx1151) at 216 GB/s and 59 TFLOP/s, from loom-roofline
roofline.py(loom-skillsecb661b); decode and 4 streams with speculative decoding: verify passes × (1 + acceptance × depth 2) tokens per pass, the drafter's cost not counted; acceptance measured in the row's own session: decode 11 %, decode at 2k 63 %, decode at 32k 82 %, 4 streams 17 %. - — not measured; n/a not applicable.
Features
| feature | status | detail |
|---|---|---|
| API | ✅ | OpenAI-style /v1/chat/completions |
| tool calling | ✅ | OpenAI-style tools and tool_calls |
| reasoning / thinking | — | not applicable |
| reasoning effort | — | not applicable |
| speculative decoding | ✅ | n-gram prompt lookup, depth 2, on by default |
| image input | — | not applicable |
| audio input / output | — | not applicable |
| sampling | ✅ | temperature, top_p, top_k, seed |
| context size | ✅ | 32,768 tokens per request |
| concurrency | ✅ | 4 concurrent requests |
| max output tokens | ✅ | 4,096 (preset max_tokens) |
Correctness
| gate | description | result |
|---|---|---|
kernel_tests |
Unit tests of the generated kernels against reference implementations | ✅ pass (45/45) ¹ |
golden |
llama.cpp reference recorded on the same GGUF: greedy tokens and top-5 log-probs, short prompts and 1k-32k documents | ✅ pass ² |
compare |
Greedy output vs the llama.cpp reference, token by token; every divergence is a near-tie | ✅ pass ² |
vision |
Image input vs llama.cpp with the same projector: identical prompt tokens, replies equal up to near-ties | — not applicable |
consistency |
Concurrent requests give the same output as the same requests run alone | ✅ pass ² |
spec |
Speculative decoding on gives exactly the output of speculative decoding off | ✅ pass ² |
agent |
Multi-turn tool-calling loop: exact prompt rendering, history reuse, valid tool calls, output vs llama.cpp | ✅ pass ² |
agent_think_off |
The tool-calling loop with thinking off | — not applicable |
sampling |
temperature, top_k and seed behave as specified; first-token distribution matches llama.cpp | ✅ pass ² |
needle |
Needle-in-a-haystack prompt at up to half the context, compared with llama.cpp; over-capacity prompt refused | ✅ pass ³ |
needle_full |
Needle-in-a-haystack prompt at the full context is served | ✅ pass ² |
decision |
Decision answers (choice, score, noul probabilities) vs llama.cpp on the same prompts | — not applicable |
- ¹ DevLab Dispatch run 42528250185, 2026-11-08; device not recorded; hrx-loom unknown.
- ² DevLab Dispatch run 42527979776, LEVEL=full, 2026-11-08; device AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S, AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics, Ubuntu 24.04; hrx-loom
0.1.0(hrx-systemd01d1c1). - ³ DevLab Dispatch run 42342192972, LEVEL=full, 2026-11-07; device AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S, AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics, Ubuntu 24.04; hrx-loom
0.1.0(hrx-systemd01d1c1). - Gates are the loom-benchmark correctness gates (
gates.sh); a gate without a recorded run shows no evidence.
Files
model.json/model.json.lock: the card and the pinned source files (sha256 checked byloom-fetch).program/*.loom,weights.loom: the generated Loom programs.tokenizer.json: the tokenizer.llm_config.json: the configuration the programs were generated from.info.json: the measurements, gate evidence and versions this card shows; everything else comes from the files above.REPORT.md: how the values above were measured: setup, commands and the value of every run.
Versions: card schema loom-card/2; loom-skills ab48a1b; hrx-loom 0.1.0 (hrx-system d01d1c1); card generator 1ed9a3e.
Source files, fetched by loom-fetch from their own repositories:
- checkpoint: bartowski/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-GGUF @
41ba88d,Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support
Model tree for loom-fun/bartowski-Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-loom
Base model
Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B Finetuned
Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct Quantized
bartowski/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-GGUF