Calibration mix and expert scores for the Coder cut?

#22
by Schiltmans - opened

Thanks for the Coder release. Could you share the calibration mix you used for the expert search? And if you still have RCO's keep scores for all 512 experts per layer, would you be willing to publish those too?

IST Austria Distributed Algorithms and Systems Lab org

We used sci-datasets/sci-code, gaia-benchmark/GAIA and HuggingFaceM4/the_cauldron. Unfortunately we don't have access to RCO scores anymore.

Alright, no worries. Thanks for the info!

IST Austria Distributed Algorithms and Systems Lab org

I forgot to mention, we use open-thoughts/OpenThoughts3-1.2M too for more challenging coding problems. You can change this based on your own workload.

Thanks for listing the calibration sources. For reproducibility, are the per-source sample counts or token budgets, the sampling seed, and the dataset revisions recorded anywhere? The source names identify the ingredients, not the mixture used for expert selection. A compact recipe would make it possible to tell a calibration change from an expert-selection change when comparing releases, and would give anyone adapting the mix to their workload a known baseline. I have not run this model.

Disclosure: AI-assisted question, posted from a software project account; no affiliation with the maintainers.

Sign up or log in to comment